Financhill
Buy
64

CCJ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$69.70
Seasonality move :
-0.63%
Day range:
$67.76 - $69.97
52-week range:
$35.00 - $71.31
Dividend yield:
0.17%
P/E ratio:
168.48x
P/S ratio:
12.62x
P/B ratio:
6.55x
Volume:
5.4M
Avg. volume:
6.1M
1-year change:
30.74%
Market cap:
$29.7B
Revenue:
$2.3B
EPS (TTM):
$0.41

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CCJ
Cameco
$581.5M $0.14 38.1% 561.45% $70.40
GFR
Greenfire Resources
-- $0.22 -- 121.33% --
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
-- -$0.23 -- -86.96% $6.93
LEU
Centrus Energy
$68.1M -$0.08 -33.15% -69.1% $160.02
SPOWF
Strata Power
-- -- -- -- --
UEC
Uranium Energy
-- -- 35589.66% -- $9.81
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CCJ
Cameco
$68.27 $70.40 $29.7B 168.48x $0.11 0.17% 12.62x
GFR
Greenfire Resources
$4.89 -- $343.4M 2.63x $0.00 0% 0.61x
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
$5.73 $6.93 $202.4M 44.59x $0.00 0% 0.30x
LEU
Centrus Energy
$190.04 $160.02 $3.2B 29.74x $0.00 0% 6.70x
SPOWF
Strata Power
$0.0065 -- $130.6K -- $0.00 0% --
UEC
Uranium Energy
$6.46 $9.81 $2.9B -- $0.00 0% 47.17x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CCJ
Cameco
13.3% 2.050 3.88% 0.99x
GFR
Greenfire Resources
28.23% 0.512 56.12% 1.37x
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
64.13% 0.112 401.95% 0.37x
LEU
Centrus Energy
68.15% 3.667 43.18% 1.20x
SPOWF
Strata Power
-4.18% -14.631 6.1% 1.56x
UEC
Uranium Energy
-- 1.952 -- 4.10x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CCJ
Cameco
$187.8M $130.8M 3.24% 3.91% 18.83% $37.4M
GFR
Greenfire Resources
$56.5M $12M 16.83% 24.76% 16.44% $4.8M
GTE
Gran Tierra Energy
$98.3M $12.4M -1.49% -3.92% 2.16% $5.7M
LEU
Centrus Energy
$32.9M $20.5M 31.54% 94.73% 52.8% $34.4M
SPOWF
Strata Power
-- -$25.2K -- -- -48.57% --
UEC
Uranium Energy
-- -$23.2M -8.09% -8.09% -22.86% -$22.9M

Cameco vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CCJ or GFR?

    Greenfire Resources has a net margin of 8.84% compared to Cameco's net margin of 8.8%. Cameco's return on equity of 3.91% beat Greenfire Resources's return on equity of 24.76%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CCJ
    Cameco
    34.22% $0.11 $5.2B
    GFR
    Greenfire Resources
    44.22% $0.16 $816M
  • What do Analysts Say About CCJ or GFR?

    Cameco has a consensus price target of $70.40, signalling upside risk potential of 3.12%. On the other hand Greenfire Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cameco has higher upside potential than Greenfire Resources, analysts believe Cameco is more attractive than Greenfire Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CCJ
    Cameco
    10 1 0
    GFR
    Greenfire Resources
    1 0 0
  • Is CCJ or GFR More Risky?

    Cameco has a beta of 0.968, which suggesting that the stock is 3.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCJ or GFR?

    Cameco has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.17%. Greenfire Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cameco pays 40.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenfire Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cameco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CCJ or GFR?

    Cameco quarterly revenues are $549M, which are larger than Greenfire Resources quarterly revenues of $127.7M. Cameco's net income of $48.5M is higher than Greenfire Resources's net income of $11.2M. Notably, Cameco's price-to-earnings ratio is 168.48x while Greenfire Resources's PE ratio is 2.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cameco is 12.62x versus 0.61x for Greenfire Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CCJ
    Cameco
    12.62x 168.48x $549M $48.5M
    GFR
    Greenfire Resources
    0.61x 2.63x $127.7M $11.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns CCJ or GTE?

    Gran Tierra Energy has a net margin of 8.84% compared to Cameco's net margin of -11.31%. Cameco's return on equity of 3.91% beat Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity of -3.92%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CCJ
    Cameco
    34.22% $0.11 $5.2B
    GTE
    Gran Tierra Energy
    57.66% -$0.54 $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About CCJ or GTE?

    Cameco has a consensus price target of $70.40, signalling upside risk potential of 3.12%. On the other hand Gran Tierra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $6.93 which suggests that it could grow by 20.94%. Given that Gran Tierra Energy has higher upside potential than Cameco, analysts believe Gran Tierra Energy is more attractive than Cameco.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CCJ
    Cameco
    10 1 0
    GTE
    Gran Tierra Energy
    2 3 0
  • Is CCJ or GTE More Risky?

    Cameco has a beta of 0.968, which suggesting that the stock is 3.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 0.808, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.173%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCJ or GTE?

    Cameco has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.17%. Gran Tierra Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cameco pays 40.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Gran Tierra Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cameco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CCJ or GTE?

    Cameco quarterly revenues are $549M, which are larger than Gran Tierra Energy quarterly revenues of $170.5M. Cameco's net income of $48.5M is higher than Gran Tierra Energy's net income of -$19.3M. Notably, Cameco's price-to-earnings ratio is 168.48x while Gran Tierra Energy's PE ratio is 44.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cameco is 12.62x versus 0.30x for Gran Tierra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CCJ
    Cameco
    12.62x 168.48x $549M $48.5M
    GTE
    Gran Tierra Energy
    0.30x 44.59x $170.5M -$19.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns CCJ or LEU?

    Centrus Energy has a net margin of 8.84% compared to Cameco's net margin of 37.21%. Cameco's return on equity of 3.91% beat Centrus Energy's return on equity of 94.73%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CCJ
    Cameco
    34.22% $0.11 $5.2B
    LEU
    Centrus Energy
    45.01% $1.60 $671.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About CCJ or LEU?

    Cameco has a consensus price target of $70.40, signalling upside risk potential of 3.12%. On the other hand Centrus Energy has an analysts' consensus of $160.02 which suggests that it could fall by -15.8%. Given that Cameco has higher upside potential than Centrus Energy, analysts believe Cameco is more attractive than Centrus Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CCJ
    Cameco
    10 1 0
    LEU
    Centrus Energy
    7 2 0
  • Is CCJ or LEU More Risky?

    Cameco has a beta of 0.968, which suggesting that the stock is 3.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Centrus Energy has a beta of 1.369, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.921%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCJ or LEU?

    Cameco has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.17%. Centrus Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cameco pays 40.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Centrus Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cameco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CCJ or LEU?

    Cameco quarterly revenues are $549M, which are larger than Centrus Energy quarterly revenues of $73.1M. Cameco's net income of $48.5M is higher than Centrus Energy's net income of $27.2M. Notably, Cameco's price-to-earnings ratio is 168.48x while Centrus Energy's PE ratio is 29.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cameco is 12.62x versus 6.70x for Centrus Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CCJ
    Cameco
    12.62x 168.48x $549M $48.5M
    LEU
    Centrus Energy
    6.70x 29.74x $73.1M $27.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns CCJ or SPOWF?

    Strata Power has a net margin of 8.84% compared to Cameco's net margin of -48.93%. Cameco's return on equity of 3.91% beat Strata Power's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CCJ
    Cameco
    34.22% $0.11 $5.2B
    SPOWF
    Strata Power
    -- -$0.00 -$222.9K
  • What do Analysts Say About CCJ or SPOWF?

    Cameco has a consensus price target of $70.40, signalling upside risk potential of 3.12%. On the other hand Strata Power has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cameco has higher upside potential than Strata Power, analysts believe Cameco is more attractive than Strata Power.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CCJ
    Cameco
    10 1 0
    SPOWF
    Strata Power
    0 0 0
  • Is CCJ or SPOWF More Risky?

    Cameco has a beta of 0.968, which suggesting that the stock is 3.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strata Power has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.79%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCJ or SPOWF?

    Cameco has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.17%. Strata Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cameco pays 40.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Strata Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cameco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CCJ or SPOWF?

    Cameco quarterly revenues are $549M, which are larger than Strata Power quarterly revenues of $37.9K. Cameco's net income of $48.5M is higher than Strata Power's net income of -$18.5K. Notably, Cameco's price-to-earnings ratio is 168.48x while Strata Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cameco is 12.62x versus -- for Strata Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CCJ
    Cameco
    12.62x 168.48x $549M $48.5M
    SPOWF
    Strata Power
    -- -- $37.9K -$18.5K
  • Which has Higher Returns CCJ or UEC?

    Uranium Energy has a net margin of 8.84% compared to Cameco's net margin of -20.57%. Cameco's return on equity of 3.91% beat Uranium Energy's return on equity of -8.09%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CCJ
    Cameco
    34.22% $0.11 $5.2B
    UEC
    Uranium Energy
    36.64% -$0.07 $877.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About CCJ or UEC?

    Cameco has a consensus price target of $70.40, signalling upside risk potential of 3.12%. On the other hand Uranium Energy has an analysts' consensus of $9.81 which suggests that it could grow by 51.9%. Given that Uranium Energy has higher upside potential than Cameco, analysts believe Uranium Energy is more attractive than Cameco.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CCJ
    Cameco
    10 1 0
    UEC
    Uranium Energy
    3 0 0
  • Is CCJ or UEC More Risky?

    Cameco has a beta of 0.968, which suggesting that the stock is 3.161% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uranium Energy has a beta of 1.395, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.457%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CCJ or UEC?

    Cameco has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.17%. Uranium Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cameco pays 40.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Uranium Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cameco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CCJ or UEC?

    Cameco quarterly revenues are $549M, which are larger than Uranium Energy quarterly revenues of $49.8M. Cameco's net income of $48.5M is higher than Uranium Energy's net income of -$30.2M. Notably, Cameco's price-to-earnings ratio is 168.48x while Uranium Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cameco is 12.62x versus 47.17x for Uranium Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CCJ
    Cameco
    12.62x 168.48x $549M $48.5M
    UEC
    Uranium Energy
    47.17x -- $49.8M -$30.2M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will RocketLab Stock Be In 5 Years?
Where Will RocketLab Stock Be In 5 Years?

Rocket Lab (NASDAQ: RKLB) closed recently at around $30 per share,…

Is MO dividend Worth It?
Is MO dividend Worth It?

Altria Group (NYSE: MO) is paying investors $1.02 a share…

How High Will Take-Two Stock Go?
How High Will Take-Two Stock Go?

Take-Two Interactive (NASDAQ:TTWO) is the video game development company behind…

Stock Ideas

Buy
64
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 49x

Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
83
GMS alert for Jun 23

GMS [GMS] is up 0.03% over the past day.

Buy
54
SMLR alert for Jun 23

Semler Scientific [SMLR] is up 16.13% over the past day.

Buy
57
GXO alert for Jun 23

GXO Logistics [GXO] is up 2.42% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock